Constant vs Sliding mesh gearbox-Difference you need to know

Here’s a detailed comparison of Constant Mesh vs Sliding Mesh Gearboxes, highlighting construction, operation, advantages, and disadvantages:

Constant vs Sliding mesh gearbox

1. Sliding Mesh Gearbox (SMG)

Construction

  • Contains input shaft, layshaft (countershaft), and output shaft (main shaft).
  • Gears are mounted directly on shafts and slide along the shaft to engage.
  • No constant meshing; gear teeth slide to mesh when shifting.
  • Usually 3–4 forward gears + 1 reverse.

Working Principle

  • Driver operates clutch and gear lever.
  • To engage a gear, gear slides along shaft to mesh with corresponding gear.
  • Power flows: Engine → Clutch → Engaged Gear → Output Shaft → Wheels.
  • Gear must be moving at nearly the same speed to avoid gear clash.

Advantages

  • Simple and inexpensive design.
  • Easy to understand and repair.
  • Light in weight.

Disadvantages

  • Gear grinding common if speeds are mismatched.
  • Harder to shift at high speeds.
  • Wear on gear teeth due to sliding action.
  • Not suitable for modern vehicles with multiple gears.

2. Constant Mesh Gearbox (CMG)

Construction

  • All gears on layshaft and main shaft are always meshed.
  • Main shaft contains sliding collars (dog clutches) to engage gears.
  • Typically 4–6 forward gears + 1 reverse.
  • Can include synchromesh rings for smoother engagement.

Working Principle

  • All gears rotate constantly (meshed).
  • Driver moves gear lever → dog clutch locks desired gear to main shaft.
  • Power flows: Engine → Clutch → Input Shaft → Layshaft → Engaged Gear → Main Shaft → Wheels.
  • Other gears spin freely; gear clash is prevented.

Advantages

  • Prevents gear grinding → smoother gear shifting.
  • Longer gear life due to constant mesh.
  • Can be combined with synchromesh → easier shifting.
  • Flexible number of gear ratios possible.

Disadvantages

  • Slightly heavier and more complex than sliding mesh.
  • Requires lubrication and maintenance for dog clutches.
  • More expensive to manufacture than sliding mesh.

Comparison Table: Sliding Mesh vs Constant Mesh Gearbox

FeatureSliding Mesh GearboxConstant Mesh Gearbox
Gear EngagementSliding gears along shaftAll gears always meshed; dog clutch selects gear
Gear GrindingCommon if speeds not matchedRare; smooth shifting
ComplexitySimpleMore complex
DurabilityLower due to sliding wearHigher; gears last longer
Ease of ShiftingHarder at high speedsEasier; synchromesh improves it further
WeightLighterSlightly heavier
CostCheaperMore expensive
ApplicationsEarly vehicles, tractorsModern cars, light commercial vehicles

Conclusion

  • Sliding Mesh Gearbox: Simple and cheap but prone to gear clash; outdated in modern vehicles.
  • Constant Mesh Gearbox: Modern, smooth, durable, suitable for cars and trucks; prevents gear grinding and allows more gears in a compact design.

Also watch : Sliding vs constant mesh gearbox animation.


Other courses:

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow by Email
Pinterest
fb-share-icon
WhatsApp
Scroll to Top